By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Tech Consumer JournalTech Consumer JournalTech Consumer Journal
  • News
  • Phones
  • Tablets
  • Wearable
  • Home Tech
  • Streaming
  • More Articles
Reading: Polaroid’s New Hi-Print for Phone Photos Doubles as a Freestanding Frame
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Tech Consumer JournalTech Consumer Journal
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Phones
  • Tablets
  • Wearable
  • Home Tech
  • Streaming
  • More Articles
Search
  • News
  • Phones
  • Tablets
  • Wearable
  • Home Tech
  • Streaming
  • More Articles
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Complaint
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Tech Consumer Journal > News > Polaroid’s New Hi-Print for Phone Photos Doubles as a Freestanding Frame
News

Polaroid’s New Hi-Print for Phone Photos Doubles as a Freestanding Frame

News Room
Last updated: April 7, 2026 4:55 pm
News Room
Share
SHARE

Polaroid is once again asking whether you’d want all your smartphone photos to take on that glossy, over-exposed look of old-school instant cameras. The sequel to the 2022 Hi-Print costs $20 more than it did before, but what you get in return is a miniature photo frame to display your cat pics with more vintage vibes than ever.

The new Hi-Print is here to compete against Fujifilm with the Instax line of smartphone-connected printers. There are two versions of Polaroid’s printer, though the one you want prints the larger 3 x 3 photos. These pictures will come out looking different than the ones you may see out of a camera like last year’s Polaroid Flip. For one, they are printed on Polaroid’s proprietary print paper, rather than Polaroid’s instant film. They’re also smaller than the 4.23 x 3.48-inch photos you’ll get from the company’s instant cameras. The benefit of this device is its versatility. This $120 printer connects to your smartphone and the Polaroid Hi-Print app, where you can add stickers or templates to photos before you bring them into the real world.

The printer’s main standout feature is the flip-out frame that lets you show off your latest dog shot on your shelf. It will save you from having to buy a separate frame, but the number of photos you’ll likely be printing will quickly eclipse what the Hi-Print can hold. The package comes with one of Polaroid’s Hi-Print 3 x 3 paper cartridges, allowing you to print just 10 photos. As per usual, the classic camera maker claims only its own Hi-Print cartridges are compatible with its new printer. A cartridge with 30 photos costs an extra $25.

No frame for the smaller and bigger Hi-Print printers

The printer for smaller, wallet-sized photos does not include the extra frame. © Polaroid

Meanwhile, the Hi-Print 2 x 3 Generation 2 Pocket Photo Printer was created to compete directly with Instax and its smaller, wallet-friendly photos. This printer costs $110, though it surprisingly lacks the flip-out frame to show off your smaller photos in your bedroom. If you want 20 more sheets of 2 x 3 photos, you’ll need to spend an extra $17. Finally, Polaroid is bringing back its $150 4 x 6 printer for larger postcard-sized photos. This version doesn’t include the frame. It costs another $40 for 80 more sheets of photo stock to print on.

Compared to the Instax Mini Link 3 or the larger Instax Link Wide, Polaroid’s Hi-Print 3 x 3 printer will likely be more presentable on a shelf, rather than stuffed into an unseen corner on your desk. The big difference is that while Instax prints on film, the Hi-Print uses its own paper cartridges. If it can nail the same distinct Polaroid look from users’ phone pics, the new Hi-Print could offer utility and looks all in one.

It just so happens that Instax recently launched the latest update to its popular line of pastel-colored instant cameras with its Mini 13. Fuji’s new camera is supposed to launch in June this year and cost around $94. As for Polaroid, we’ll have to see what next cameras they may debut in 2026.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Supermassive Black Hole Without a Galaxy Changes What We Thought Came First

There’s a Hidden Signal in the Sun, Study Suggests

Airstrikes on Iran’s Oil Facilities Spewed as Much Toxic Sulfur as an Erupting Volcano

The First Successful AI Wearable Won’t Be Your Friend

Elon Musk Is Already Preparing to Evict Anthropic from SpaceX’s Data Center

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Previous Article A Cure for Knee Arthritis? It May Be Closer Than You Think
Next Article Sam Altman Says It’ll Take Another Year Before ChatGPT Can Start a Timer
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

248.1kLike
69.1kFollow
134kPin
54.3kFollow

Latest News

Jared Leto and Sam Altman Say They Can Thwart Ticket Scalper Bots by Scanning Your Eyeballs
News
Scientists Identify Potential New Source of Antibiotic-Resistant Superbugs—and It’s Not What You Think
News
‘Sugar’ Season 2 Teases a New Case and More Neo-Noir Ennui
News
Qualcomm’s New ‘Compute’ Chip Wants to Knock the MacBook Neo off Its Pedestal
News
Oura’s Ring 5 Is Its Slimmest and Most Accurate Smart Ring Yet
News
Hollywood Really Wants Curry Barker’s Next Film, No Not That One
News
The Harrowing ‘Testaments’ Finale Feels Like the End of the Beginning
News
Trump Administration Wants to Give Cold War-Era Plutonium to Nuclear Energy Start Ups
News

You Might also Like

News

NASA Unveils Ambitious Timeline to Build a Human Habitat on the Moon

News Room News Room 5 Min Read
News

Paleontologists Just Found the Peacock of the Dinosaur Era

News Room News Room 5 Min Read
News

Energy Developer Accidentally Bulldozes Indigenous Heritage Site ‘Beyond Recovery’

News Room News Room 5 Min Read
Tech Consumer JournalTech Consumer Journal
Follow US
2024 © Prices.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • For Advertisers
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?