By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Tech Consumer JournalTech Consumer JournalTech Consumer Journal
  • News
  • Phones
  • Tablets
  • Wearable
  • Home Tech
  • Streaming
Reading: Why Enigma Wouldn’t Stand a Chance Today
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Tech Consumer JournalTech Consumer Journal
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Phones
  • Tablets
  • Wearable
  • Home Tech
  • Streaming
Search
  • News
  • Phones
  • Tablets
  • Wearable
  • Home Tech
  • Streaming
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Complaint
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Tech Consumer Journal > News > Why Enigma Wouldn’t Stand a Chance Today
News

Why Enigma Wouldn’t Stand a Chance Today

News Room
Last updated: May 13, 2025 1:53 pm
News Room
Share
SHARE

In the 1930s and 40s, mathematician Alan Turing and other Allied cryptologists devoted monumental efforts to break the German encryption machine, the Enigma, which Nazis used to send secret messages during World War II. Today, however, modern computers and artificial intelligence could break the Enigma code without breaking a sweat, as reported by The Guardian.

“Enigma wouldn’t stand up to modern computing and statistics,” Michael Wooldridge, a professor of computer science at the University of Oxford, told the publication.

In the 1930s, Polish cryptologists began the arduous task of decoding Enigma, which at one point had 150,000,000,000,000,000,000 possible solutions. They successfully developed “bombas,” also called “bombes”—machines that could decrypt messages encrypted by Enigma. Germany increased the complexity of Enigma’s encryption, however, and as the threat of German invasion loomed, Poland’s intelligence bureau handed over their work to the British and French. The British team, including Alan Turing, built upon Poland’s work. They exploited weaknesses in the Enigma codes, such as the fact that no letter was ever encrypted as itself.

“Essentially the enigma devices got their power because the number of possible ways in which a message could be encrypted was astronomically large. Far, far too large for a human to exhaustively check,” Wooldridge told The Guardian, adding that bombes were essentially mechanical computers that automatically sifted through the gargantuan number of possible decryptions.

Sound familiar? That’s because modern-day artificial intelligence is trained to do exactly that: find patterns in huge amounts of data, which would take scientists a prohibitive amount of time to calculate by hand. It’s no surprise, then, that Turing is considered the father of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence. If only he could see how far the field has come since his time.

“It would be straightforward to recreate the logic of bombes in a conventional program,” such as ChatGPT, Wooldridge explained, as reported by The Guardian. “Then with the speed of modern computers, the laborious work of the bombes would be done in very short order,” he added. “Enigma would not remotely be a match for these.”

When I asked ChatGPT to confirm this directly, it responded: “Wooldridge’s quote is broadly accurate: Enigma would not stand a chance today. But it’s not because AI like ChatGPT alone can break it—it’s because modern computing can trivially simulate what the Allied bombes did, and do so much faster.”

This, however, doesn’t make Turing and his colleagues’ achievement any less admirable—especially given some estimates that their efforts shortened the war by up to two years.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

I Asked AI to Write a Protest Chant. What I Got Back Was Surprisingly Subversive

Roborock Smart Robot Drops from $599 to $159, Amazon Clears Stock at All-Time Low

Sony is Still Putting Its Faith in ‘Marathon’

How to Watch the F1 Canadian GP 2025 on a Free Channel

Dave Bautista’s Next Franchise Play? Becoming a ‘Cat Assassin’

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Previous Article RFK Jr. Takes Grandkids for a Swim in Toxic Sludge
Next Article I’m So Damn Tired of Monitors With High Refresh Rates and Nothing Else
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

248.1kLike
69.1kFollow
134kPin
54.3kFollow

Latest News

Sony’s Waterproof Speaker Is Nearly Free before Prime Day, Perfect Chance to Prep for Summer Travel
News
Laika’s ‘ParaNorman’ Is Coming Back to Theaters
News
It’s Not Free Yet, but This 15″ HP Laptop (Core i3, 2TB SSD, 64GB RAM) Is $2,300 Off on Amazon
News
It’s Game (Almost) Over In the Final Squid Game Trailer
News
Neanderthals Spread Across Asia With Surprising Speed—and Now We Know How
News
This Roborock Q7 Max Robot Vacuum and Mop Drops to Near-Free Price Thanks to Almost 50% Off on Amazon
News
I Asked AI to Create a Pro-ICE Chant. Google and Meta Did. ChatGPT Said No.
News
Air Conditioners Can Actually Support the Power Grid. Here’s How
News

You Might also Like

News

As Trump Comes for Your Social Media, It’s Time You Consider What’s Worth Sharing

News Room News Room 13 Min Read
News

NASA Satellite Captures Massive Wastewater Flow off California Coast

News Room News Room 4 Min Read
News

Google’s Veo 3 AI Slopfest Just Reached New Heights

News Room News Room 5 Min Read
Tech Consumer JournalTech Consumer Journal
Follow US
2024 © Prices.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • For Advertisers
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?